Published: November 17, 2025

MONROVIA — Guinea’s long-awaited launch of the multibillion-dollar Simandou iron ore project this week was portrayed as a triumph of national pride, geopolitical alignment, and economic ambition. However, one absence that was impossible to overlook was that Liberia, one of Guinea’s closest neighbors, a historic trading partner, and a potential transit route for Guinean ore, received no invitation.
For decades, Liberia has served as the main export route for minerals from the shared Nimba Mountain Range. It is the only country in the region with an operational heavy-haul railroad linking mining areas to the Atlantic, and the route through which U.S.-based Ivanhoe Liberia, formerly HPX, aims to ship Guinean ore under a pending rail access agreement. However, as Guinea celebrated the first Simandou shipment from its new Morébaya port, Liberia’s absence highlighted the political and economic reality that Conakry intends to control its ore routes exclusively from within its borders.
A Strategic Message
At the launch ceremony, Guinean junta leader Gen. Mamady Doumbouya stood alongside Chinese Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong, Rwanda’s Paul Kagame, and Gabon’s Brice Oligui Nguema, Côte d’Ivoire’s Prime Minister Robert Beugré Mambé; and the Chief Minister of the Republic of Sierra Leone, David Moinina Sengeh. The gathering showcased Guinea’s ambition to become a key hub in Africa’s next industrial wave. Doumbouya declared a national holiday. Chinese officials emphasized how vital Simandou’s high-grade ore will be for China’s “green steel” agenda. Rio Tinto executives highlighted the global significance of bringing the world’s largest undeveloped iron-ore deposit into production.
But it was the guest list that told the bigger story. Countries thousands of miles away were represented; Liberia, which shares the Nimba mountain range and historically provided the nearest export corridor, was not.
Guinea’s government has invested heavily, politically and financially, in the Trans-Guinean Railway and the Matakong deep-water port.
The HPX Question
Liberia’s discomfort is heightened by the uncertainty surrounding HPX’s cross-border plans. President Joseph Boakai’s administration has already given the company a green light to export ore via the Yekepa–Buchanan corridor. The agreement, now before the Legislature, positions Liberia as a multi-user rail hub that could benefit from transit fees and expanded infrastructure use.
But while Liberia has approved its side of the plan, Guinea has not approved its own. There is no written consent, no public endorsement, and no official statement confirming that Guinean ore from Nimba will be allowed to cross into Liberia. Multiple diplomatic queries from Monrovia have gone unanswered, The Liberian Investigator gathered.
The silence appears deliberate. Guinea is nearing completion of its $18–20 billion Trans-Guinean Railway, a 650-kilometer route designed to transport ore from Simandou and the Guinean side of Nimba to Matakong without crossing Liberian territory. Engineering studies show that HPX’s Nimba concession is close enough to connect directly to this new corridor, which involves fewer political complications than a route through Liberia.
A Risk with Long Shadow
Liberia’s eagerness to move forward with the HPX rail agreement, without any clear cooperation from Conakry, puts it in a vulnerable position. If Guinea later refuses cross-border exports, Liberia would be stuck with a long-term concession that can’t be used as intended, damaged diplomatic relations with a rising neighbor, and face potential commercial disputes with ArcelorMittal, which already depends on the same railway for its operations.
Several Liberian lawmakers have expressed concern that the country may be committing to actions without confirming whether Guinea truly agrees.
The Senate Joint Committee, headed by Senator H. Saah Joseph, has requested documentary proof that the recently concluded Liberia–Guinea Concession and Access Agreement (CAA) was negotiated and signed in full compliance with the 2019 Implementation Agreement governing cross-border rail and port access. In a letter dated Nov. 12, the Committee stated that Liberia faces diplomatic fallout and treaty violations if mandatory institutional steps, including a joint review with Guinea, were skipped.
The lawmakers requested evidence of feasibility studies, financing commitments, environmental safeguards, risk-sharing arrangements, and community engagement. They also asked for certified communication from the Government of Guinea explicitly approving or concurring with the CAA, as required under the implementation framework. “No agreement shall be executed or ratified by either party without the formal approval or concurrence of the Government of Guinea,” the Committee reminded.
The Senate further questioned why the HPX Liberty Corridor project was omitted from the proposed concession, despite expectations that it would be featured in such a critical document. The Committee warned that failure to provide the requested evidence could trigger suspension of the CAA’s legislative consideration and “invite further parliamentary scrutiny.”
A Region Reconfigured
China is now deeply embedded in Guinea’s iron-ore sector, financing and co-developing the Trans-Guinean infrastructure while locking in high-grade ore for its steel industry. Rio Tinto, operating Simandou blocks 3 and 4, positions the project as a rival to Australia’s Pilbara exports. Winning Consortium Simandou manages the engineering and logistics backbone that ties the project together.
With this alignment of interests, Guinea’s insistence on using domestic infrastructure becomes predictable. China wants stability and control. Rio Tinto wants predictable market access. Guinea wants sovereignty and leverage. None of these interests encourage routing ore through Liberia under a private agreement involving HPX.
HPX’s model, exporting Guinean ore through Liberia, shifts power and revenue away from the Trans-Guinean system. That is a strategic mismatch for Conakry




Discussion about this post