House defers resolution to fine lawmakers for disorderly conduct

Published: November 5, 2025

CAPITOL HILL, Monrovia — The House of Representatives on Tuesday postponed action on a proposed resolution that would impose fines and possible suspensions on lawmakers who disrupt plenary sessions, after members raised procedural concerns about the measure’s introduction.

The proposal, sponsored by Montserrado County District 7 Representative Emmanuel Dahn, aims to strengthen the enforcement of decorum rules during debates. Titled “Alternative Measures for Decorum in the House of Representatives,” the resolution specifies penalties for lawmakers who provoke colleagues, use profanity, speak out of turn, or otherwise disrupt proceedings.

Under the draft, a first offense would result in a $5,000 fine, payable to the Consolidated Account within 24 hours. A lawmaker who fails to provide proof of payment would be barred from the next session. Repeated violations could lead to a one-week suspension without pay.Dahn argued the resolution is intended to “foster a respectful and productive environment” and reinforce the public’s confidence in the Legislature.

“These measures are not punitive but corrective,” Dahn told colleagues. “The integrity of debate depends on discipline.”

Procedural Objections Halt Debate

The measure was halted shortly after its introduction when Bong County District 3 Representative Marvin Cole questioned whether it had met the requirements for consideration. He noted that resolutions must be circulated to members at least 24 hours in advance and carry a minimum of 37 signatures before being debated.

Margibi County Representative Ivar Jones supported Cole’s objection, noting that the House already has Standing Rules governing disorderly conduct, and cautioned that duplicating penalties might lead to contradictions.

After a brief but tense exchange on the floor, Speaker Richard Koon ruled to defer the resolution to the next sitting. He instructed the Chief Clerk to verify whether the proposal meets all procedural criteria.

Debate on Conduct

Though temporarily shelved, the proposal reflects growing concern among lawmakers and the public over frequent disruptions and heated exchanges in plenary, incidents often broadcast live.

Some members expressed support for the spirit of Dahn’s effort, arguing that the House has struggled to maintain decorum. Others said empowering the presiding officer and Chief Clerk to enforce fines and suspensions could raise questions about fairness and consistency.

The House is expected to revisit the matter at its next sitting.