Former renowned Liberian broadcast journalist, Aaron Kollie once said of former Liberian leader, Charles Taylor that “to say I’m sorry is a sign of strength and not weakness.”
Henry Costa has done just that. Costa is a well-known Liberian political commentator, and he has publicly apologized to his supporters and President Joseph N. Boakai for the insults he directed at Mr. Boakai when he was the standard bearer for the now ruling Unity Party government during Liberia’s most recent presidential elections. Costa’s statement, delivered in his live Facebook podcast on Thursday, February 13th, has generated significant political and public discourse, raising questions about its motivations, timing, and potential impact on Liberia’s political landscape.
The Apology: A Shift in Tone
Costa’s apology marks a notable departure from his previously aggressive rhetoric against Boakai. During the campaign period, Costa became a vocal critic of the man whom he spent almost six years supporting. But during the 11th hour of political campaigning in Liberia, Costa often used inflammatory language to challenge Boakai’s competence and political viability after the political marriage fell apart. However, his recent public statement suggests a shift in tone, acknowledging his missteps and extending an olive branch to both the president and his (Costa’s) own support base. This move could be interpreted as a strategic recalibration rather than a mere expression of remorse.
Potential Motivations Behind the Apology
Several factors could have influenced Costa’s decision to apologize: Political Realignment: Given Liberia’s dynamic political landscape, Costa may be seeking to reposition himself in a way that ensures his continued relevance. With Boakai now in power, maintaining a confrontational stance could be politically and professionally disadvantageous for Costa. Public Relations and DamageControl: Costa’s apology may be an attempt to repair his public image. As a media figure who commands a huge following within Liberia and elsewhere, his credibility and influence rely on public perception. A prolonged stance of hostility toward the sitting president, like he did with former President George Weah for six years, could erode his support among moderate followers who still admire and love Costa. Legal or Political Pressures: It is also possible that Costa faced behind-the-scenes pressures-either legal threats, political negotiations, or appeals from influential figures within the UP-that compelled him to soften his stance.Genuine Reflection: While skepticism exists, it cannot be ruled out that Costa’s apology stems from genuine introspection and a desire to foster national unity rather than division. Costa’s mention that when you are leading a group of followers, it’s no longer about you is certainly true. Costa’s move from what management professor, Dr. Richard L. Daft in his book, The Leadership Experience, calls “the celebrity “leader-as a hero” to the hard working behind the scenes leader who quietly builds a strong following by supporting and developing others rather than touting his or her own abilities and successes” is crucially significant here.
Costa’s Future Intentions and Business Aspirations
One of the most significant aspects of Costa’s statement was his assertion that despite his apology, he has no interest in pursuing a government job, engaging in Liberian politics, or being used as a tool to insult or campaign for or against opposition political parties. This declaration sets clear boundaries regarding his future political engagement. Rejection of Political Engagement: Costa’s decision to step away from Liberian politics could indicate political fatigue or a calculated move to distance himself from potential controversies as the voice of the voiceless. This may serve as a protective measure to avoid being entangled in Liberia’s often volatile political landscape. Non-Support for the Ruling Party: By explicitly stating that he will not support the current ruling party, Costa is reinforcing his independence. This stance may appeal to those who view him as a principled figure unwilling to be co-opted by any political group. Focus on Business and Mining: Costa’s expressed interest in Liberia’s mining sector signals a shift toward economic endeavors. This move suggests a pragmatic approach to securing financial stability outside of the political sphere. Given Liberia’s rich natural resources, involvement in the mining industry could provide lucrative opportunities even though it also presents regulatory and ethical challenges.
Implications for Liberia’s Political Climate
Costa’s apology and future political plans could have several implications for Liberia’s political environment: Reconciliation and National Unity: In a country where political discourse is often polarized, Costa’s gesture may contribute to a broader effort toward reconciliation. If the ruling establishment and opposition figures embrace a more cooperative approach, this could lead to a more stable governance environment. Impact on Opposition Politics: Costa has been an influential figure in opposition circles. His softened stance toward Boakai might signal a shift in opposition strategies, potentially influencing how critics of the government engage with the administration moving forward. Media and Political Accountability: As a highly admired political commentator, Costa’s public apology raises questions about the intersection of media activism and political engagement. It underscores the responsibilities of public commentators in shaping national discourse and the potential consequences of unchecked rhetoric. Economic Influence: If Costa successfully transitions into the mining sector, he may wield economic influence that could indirectly affect Liberia’s political dynamics. His business ventures will be closely monitored to see whether they align with his stated intentions of remaining politically neutral.
The Public and Political Response
Reactions to Costa’s apology have been mixed. Some supporters view his statement as a mature and commendable step toward healing political divisions. Others, however, remain skeptical, questioning whether this move is driven by personal interests rather than national concerns. Within Boakai’s camp, the response may vary between those who see this as an opportunity to consolidate political unity and those who remain wary of Costa’s motives.
Note: Let me establish here that I have never met Costa in person or virtually. He might not even know me. However, I have listened to him several times on social media platforms, and I must confess that the brother is extremely brilliant. Henry has certain oratory gifts in him that I have rarely seen in his peers or generation.
Discussion about this post