Democracy, often hailed as the crowning achievement of political development, is predicated on the principles of people’s sovereignty, the rule of law, and equal participation for all in the governing process.
By Austin S. Fallah, Contributing Writer
However, in the heart of West Africa, Liberia’s tryst with democracy has been marred by a history of civil strife, rampant corruption, and a fractured judiciary.
This parley probes the precarious state of democracy in Liberia and deliberates whether Liberians should consider alternative governance models as a temporary measure to resuscitate the nation’s political health, eventually paving the way for a robust and unassailable democratic system.
The Current State of Democracy in Liberia
Liberia, Africa’s oldest republic, has been a testament to the resilience and determination of its people.
With several devastating upheavals in recent memory, the country has struggled to bounce back and implement a stable democratic system.
Post-war elections have seen relatively peaceful transitions of power, but deep-rooted challenges persist.
The Liberian democracy is continually tested by endemic corruption, a judiciary that often lacks independence, and a general apprehension that the rule of law is selectively applied.
Argument for Alternative Governance
Faced with these challenges, the question arises.
Is democracy currently failing Liberia?
Some argue that the country’s nascent democratic institutions are ill-equipped to tackle systemic corruption and enforce the rule of law.
Advocates for exploring other governance options, albeit temporarily, cite examples of nations that have adopted authoritarian measures to achieve economic and social reform.
They argue these models could be the crucible within which Liberia’s structural issues, such as corruption and lack of an independent judiciary, are addressed with an iron hand before a fully-fledged democracy is re-instated.
Looking into such precedents, one can observe the initial economic success stories under authoritarian regimes in Singapore and Rwanda.
These nations, albeit under restricted political freedoms, managed to create an environment of discipline and order necessary for economic regeneration and development.
It is under such a stringent framework that corruption could be swiftly dealt with, and the judiciary fortified.
Hence, there is a school of thought that suggests that a temporary shift from democracy could pave the way for Liberia to reformat its political landscape and achieve the societal overhaul necessary for a truly democratic society to flourish.
Counterargument for Upholding Democracy
Conversely, skeptics of shelving democracy argue that once suspended, democratic freedoms are notoriously difficult to reinstate.
The power vacuum created by the absence of democracy is often an invitation to despotism and tyranny.
History is replete with leaders who, initially assuming powers to rectify societal malaise, end up entrenching themselves and perpetuating the very corruption they set out to abolish.
Moreover, it is argued that the ideals of democracy, including a free press, freedom of speech, and the right to dissent, are the very mechanisms through which corruption can be exposed and combated.
An independent judiciary, which is the bulwark against the concentration of power, can only flourish under democratic conditions.
Advocates for democracy argue that it’s through sturdier democratic institutions and not their suspension that Liberia can achieve sustainable development.
Efforts must lie in empowering civil society, educating the electorate, and bolstering democratic institutions rather than abandoning them.
Furthermore, the Keynesian premise of trial and error applies to the political sphere.
Democracy permits a self-correcting mechanism through periodic elections, which is not guaranteed in an authoritarian setup.
It allows for the peaceful transition of power and provides avenues for public participation and accountability that go hand in hand with economic progress and respect for human rights.
I want to conclude here by saying that our nation, Liberia stands at a crossroads where the fruits of democracy have been bittersweet.
Integrating substantive democratic norms into its political framework remains a Herculean task.
While democracy’s immediate dividends seem to be few, the long-term benefits of nurturing this system grow exponentially with time.
Plunging the nation into an authoritarian experiment might yield rapid remedies but could strip the populace of the very liberties that define their humanity and aspirations.
Given the complexities of the human experience and our historical vantage point, we must acknowledge that the road to a true, functioning democracy is fraught with challenges.
Nevertheless, it is precisely through the democratic process, with all its imperfections, that nations build the fabric of justice, transparency, and accountability.
For Liberia, the answer might not lie in a rigid dichotomy of democracy versus authoritarianism but rather in a more refined approach erecting more robust democratic institutions whilst taking bold, decisive actions against the malaise afflicting the system.
To truly fortify Liberia, a concerted effort from all sectors of society is needed, a social contract re-envisioned with an engaged citizenry, a resilient judiciary, and leaders of integrity.
Such a rejuvenated democratic model might not be an immediate panacea for all of Liberia’s ills, but it is the surest path to a stable, prosperous, and just society. In the end, the beacon of democracy, although dimly lit, must be guarded zealously for the sake of Liberia’s present and future generations.
Discussion about this post