The silence of the Liberia National Police regarding the alleged death threat against Speaker Cllr. J. Fonati Koffa is both alarming and deeply troubling. Compounding this is the government’s decision to withdraw Koffa’s state security, a move that exposes him to greater danger and raises serious questions about the country’s commitment to the rule of law and the protection of its public officials.
On December 9, Speaker Koffa received a chilling SMS warning him to resign or face lethal consequences. The message, sent from a number registered to one Doris Bumie, declared: “Koffa, the speaker job is for the UP. Our party won’t sit there and reward its enemies. We will kill you if we have to. Hint to the wise is sufficient. RESIGN NOW!!!” The threat was immediately reported to the Joint Security apparatus, which reportedly launched an investigation. However, to date, the Liberia National Police has failed to provide any updates or assurances. No public statement has been issued, no suspects have been identified, and no progress has been communicated to the media or the public. This silence is not only unacceptable but also serves to embolden those who seek to use violence to achieve political ends.
As if the death threat itself were not enough, the government’s decision to withdraw Speaker Koffa’s state security adds another layer of irresponsibility. This decision, communicated this week, has left the Speaker vulnerable and raises serious concerns about the government’s priorities. In response, Koffa took to Facebook to reaffirm his commitment to upholding the Constitution, stating, “These actions from the Executive do NOT change the fact that I remain the Speaker of the House of Representatives. This only further strengthens my resolve to fight for upholding the Rule of Law and the Liberian Constitution.” His defiance is admirable, but the fact that such a situation exists is a damning indictment of the government’s failure to protect one of its highest-ranking officials, a member of the opposition party.
The actions of Attorney General Cllr. N. Oswald Tweh have further complicated an already volatile situation. By aligning the government with the so-called Majority Bloc and declaring their legislative actions lawful, Tweh has overstepped his authority. His interpretation of the Supreme Court’s December 6 ruling, which he claims validates the bloc’s actions, undermines the Court’s authority. The Supreme Court is the highest legal arbiter in the land, and only it has the power to clarify its rulings. The Attorney General’s unilateral interpretation, particularly in favor of one faction, is both improper and inflammatory.
This crisis is not just a test for the Supreme Court but also a litmus test for President Joseph Boakai’s administration. The ARREST Agenda, which places a strong emphasis on the rule of law, is now under scrutiny. The administration’s handling of this crisis will determine its democratic credentials. The withdrawal of Koffa’s security and the government’s inaction on the death threat send a troubling signal to the public and the international community. If a sitting Speaker cannot be protected, what message does this send about the safety and security of ordinary Liberians or foreign investors?
The Liberia National Police must provide a transparent update on the investigation into the death threat. The government must restore Speaker Koffa’s state security and ensure that all parties adhere to the Supreme Court’s ruling. Anything less would be a betrayal of the Liberian people and the democratic principles that underpin the nation.
The rule of law is the cornerstone of any democracy, and its erosion threatens the very fabric of governance. The actions of Liberia’s leaders during this crisis will be remembered not just by the public but by history. It is a moment for decisive action, accountability, and an unwavering commitment to justice. Protecting Speaker Koffa and upholding the Constitution are not just moral imperatives; they are fundamental obligations of the state. Anything less is a failure of leadership and a betrayal of Liberia’s democratic ideals.
Discussion about this post