𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐋𝐢𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐎𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐮𝐦

Published: November 24, 2025

If you followed yesterday’s hearing on the Oranto Petroleum and TotalEnergies Production Sharing Agreements, you’d realize it raised more questions than answers for the Liberian Senate.

Back in 2007, Oranto acquired offshore oil blocks in Liberia but never drilled a single exploration well. Instead, they sold those rights to Chevron, earning over $100 million in profit. Liberia was left with nothing—no drilling, no jobs, no development of our national infrastructure. Some Liberians who worked with Oranto say they weren’t paid. Now, after abandoning Liberia once, Oranto has returned, asking us to trust them again.

The signature bonuses touted by the Executive Branch are, at best, a misleading measure of an oil company’s true strength and commitment. Under the current contract, Oranto will pay these bonuses in installments over 4 to 5 years, not upfront.

Oranto and its parent company, Atlas Petroleum, have a disturbing track record across Africa. In Uganda, Atlas was awarded the Ngassa block in 2007 but never drilled a well or built infrastructure. After nearly a decade of inactivity, Uganda canceled the license. In Senegal, Oranto holds the Saint Louis Offshore Profond block but has conducted no meaningful exploration. Similarly, in Equatorial Guinea, the pattern persists—long periods without drilling, seismic work beyond initial efforts, and repeated extensions with no results. Industry trackers like Africa Intelligence have documented these failures. The pattern is clear: they secure acreage, make big promises, then walk away, selling out and profiting.

Our neighbor, Sierra Leone, faced a similar problem. Just last week, it canceled Innoson Oil and Gas’ exploration license—a company akin to Oranto—for failing to meet commitments. Sierra Leone made it clear: no more holding valuable national assets without developing them. Liberia must learn from this and avoid deals with companies lacking a credible track record.

Adding to our concerns, the fiscal terms of the new agreement are troubling. The advertised signature bonus is $3.75 million per block, totaling $15 million for four blocks. But the contract says Oranto only needs to pay $1.25 million per block within 120 days of ratification. The remaining $10 million has no fixed deadline; it’s tied to seismic work that experts believe may not happen for years—possibly near the next election. This loophole allows the company to delay or avoid payments, exposing Liberia to serious financial and operational risks.

All these issues—the long history of nonperformance, failed commitments across Africa, weak fiscal terms, and the lack of credible financial guarantees—point to one clear conclusion: Liberia cannot afford this deal. The only option is to reject it and demand companies that can actually deliver.

I call on my colleagues in the Senate to reject this contract and send it back to President Boakai for withdrawal.

As a proud member of the Liberian Senate and someone who supports President Boakai’s efforts to attract new investment in our oil and gas sector, let us partner only with companies that have a proven track record of exploration, operational capability, and financial strength. Liberia deserves partners with the integrity, expertise, and resources to responsibly develop our natural resources.

I know some might say that the Senate should “fix it.”There is nothing to fix! Together, we can pursue better partnerships, negotiate stronger deals, and build an oil sector that truly benefits our people. But the current agreement is not the way forward.